Authors: Bente Træen & Frode Thuen

Bente Træen & Frode Thuen (2022) Non-consensual and Consensual Non-monogamy in Norway, International Journal of Sexual Health, 34:1, 65-80, DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1947931

Overview

The study explores the experiences of Norwegians with both non-consensual and consensual non-monogamy. It aims to provide insights into how these practices are related to relationship intimacy and attitudes towards sex and sexuality.

Methodology

• Participants: The study involved a web sample of 4,160 Norwegians, aged between 18 and 89 years.
• Data Collection: Data were collected through questionnaires.

Key Findings

1. Prevalence of Non-Monogamy:

• Non-Consensual Non-Monogamy: 26.3% of men and 17.8% of women reported having experienced non-consensual non-monogamy.
• Consensual Non-Monogamy: Around 3% reported engaging in consensual non-monogamy.

2. Relationship Dynamics:

• Participants with experiences of consensual non-monogamy showed a higher correlation with relationship intimacy and positive sexual attitudes compared to those with no or non-consensual experiences.

3. Sexual Health Risks:

• In the most recent extradyadic sexual event, 21.5% of heterosexual men and 47.1% of gay/bisexual men reported using condoms, indicating potential risks for sexually transmitted diseases.

4. Social Norms and Perceptions:

• Non-consensual non-monogamy is generally condemned as a serious deviation from social norms.
• Despite this, a considerable number of people worldwide engage in non-consensual non-monogamy.

5. Historical Context in Norway:

• Past studies in Norway (1987, 1992, 2002) showed varying percentages (13% to 17%) of married or cohabiting individuals having extradyadic sexual partners, but these studies didn't differentiate between consensual and non-consensual non-monogamy.

6. Global Context:

• In North America, 3-7% of the population is estimated to be in relationships allowing non-monogamy.
• A higher proportion, possibly up to 20%, might have been part of a consensual non-monogamy relationship at some point in their lives.

Conclusion

The paper highlights the complexity and varied nature of non-monogamous relationships. It underscores the need to understand these dynamics in the context of relationship satisfaction, sexual health, and societal norms.